Customer story · anonymised at the institution's request

How a Central European university handled 12,000 applicants in a single weekend

A faculty of medicine had outgrown its in-person entrance exam. Renting halls, printing booklets, and coordinating invigilators across three cities had become the single biggest line item of the admissions year. They moved one round to Gater as a pilot — and never went back.

12,000
applicants in one round
−64%
cost per applicant
11 days
shaved off processing
0
confirmed cheating disputes lost

The problem

The faculty was running a single national entrance exam attended by roughly 12,000 applicants per cycle, in three rented venues. Travel, accommodation, and printing cost the institution well over €40 per applicant before a single test was scored. Add invigilator pay, manual scanning of answer sheets, and a two-week dispute window, and the admissions team was effectively running a logistics company every spring.

The Vice-Dean for Education had two non-negotiables: keep the academic standard of the test, and stay inside Czech and EU data-protection law. Existing remote-proctoring vendors all required either US data transfers or month-long IT integration projects.

Why Gater

They evaluated three platforms over six weeks. Gater was chosen on three points:

  • EU data residency by default. All evidence and personal data stay in EU regions. The DPA was pre-signed and matched the university's template.
  • Per-session pricing. The previous vendor quoted per enrolled student, including the 18% no-show rate. Gater charged only for the 9,840 applicants who actually sat the exam.
  • Self-serve question bank. Faculty staff loaded their existing question pool from a spreadsheet on day one. No professional-services engagement was required.

The pilot

The first cohort — 600 applicants for a niche dentistry programme — went live four weeks after kick-off. Twelve high-severity flags were raised by the AI; nine were dismissed by the review team after watching the evidence bundle, three were confirmed and resulted in invalidated tests. Every decision was supported by a tamper-evident ZIP archive, and not a single appeal succeeded.

“The thing that surprised me wasn't the AI flagging — it was that I could show the appeals committee a single ZIP file with timestamps, snapshots, and a SHA-256 manifest, and the conversation ended there.”
— Vice-Dean for Education

The full round

Two months later they ran the entire 12,000-applicant general medicine round on Gater. End-to-end, from registration close to published results, took 4 days instead of the previous 15. The admissions office moved 1.8 full-time staff onto other work permanently.

What we’d do differently

The faculty's honest feedback: schedule the system-check window earlier — too many applicants ran the device check on exam day, and a small minority needed live support to enable webcam permissions on managed school laptops. We've since shipped a system-check reminder email 48 hours before the exam.

Want a similar pilot?

We'll run your first 100 sessions for free, on your real question pool.